Identity Governance for Government.
Identity Governance for federal and state government — designed against NIST 800-53 access-control families, FedRAMP Moderate or High authorization, FISMA quarterly reporting, and OMB M-22-09 zero-trust executive order alignment.
Drivers in government
- NIST 800-53 AC-1 through AC-25 access control implementation
- FedRAMP authorization (Moderate or High)
- FISMA quarterly reporting on access compliance
- OMB M-22-09 zero-trust EO identity pillar maturity
Regulations this combination must satisfy.
- NIST 800-53 Rev 5
- FedRAMP Moderate / High
- FISMA
- OMB M-22-09
- CMMC (defense)
- StateRAMP
Patterns we actually ship for government.
- Pattern · 01
US-citizen-only delivery for cleared environments
- Pattern · 02
NIST 800-53 control mapping baked into the IGA workflow
- Pattern · 03
FedRAMP-aware deployment in GovCloud + government tenants
- Pattern · 04
Account categorization (privileged, non-privileged, contractor, partner) per NIST AC-2
Common questions.
Do you support FedRAMP Moderate vs High deployments?+
Yes — both. Moderate uses standard cloud tenants; High requires GovCloud / Azure Government / Okta for US Government. NIST 800-53 control implementations differ; we map per authorization level.
How does OMB M-22-09 affect IGA design?+
The identity pillar of the zero-trust EO requires phishing-resistant MFA, fine-grained authorization, and continuous monitoring. IGA is the access-decision side; we engineer it alongside the IdP + PAM layers.
Ready to scope Identity Governance for Government?
Two-week diagnostic. Audit-ready artifacts. Same engineers from discovery through handoff.